![brentwood eagle eye brentwood eagle eye](https://eagleeyecentre.com.sg/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/showcase_32.jpg)
In the curriculum of English classes, the teachers have worked to create board-approved materials. In the libraries of public schools, books have been vetted by trained librarians hired by the school board. The nuance lies in what constitutes “harm” and who gets to decide. No parent, teacher, or member of the school board wants children to read books that do them harm. On that statement alone, it’s safe to say that no one would disagree with Lavin. “We would like to remove books from schools that we believe to be harmful to children, their development, and their psyche.” Louis Chapter of Moms for Liberty, Tricia Lavin, outlined the group’s justification for pursuing the removal of works like The Bluest Eye from school libraries. But in this case, it’s the exception that proves the rule.Ī representative from the St.
![brentwood eagle eye brentwood eagle eye](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/4a/5a/20/4a5a20ca6f1f62c651a4823ab10a6b96.png)
In the Rockwood, Francis Howell, and Lindbergh school districts, efforts to ban multiple books relating to LGBTQIA+ identities were shot down. While the decision has since been rescinded after significant national media attention, the region has continued to see other such efforts in recent weeks. In January of 2022, Wentzville School District gained some of that national attention for successfully banning Toni Morisson’s The Bluest Eye for obscenity. This fixation on school literature is also finding a home right here in St. According to data from the American Libraries Association, there were 330 nation-wide book challenges in fall of 2021 alone. Nationally, this movement looks like a whole lot of attempts to ban books from public school classrooms and school libraries. So what does a national movement like this look like?
![brentwood eagle eye brentwood eagle eye](https://ssl.cdn-redfin.com/photo/10/bigphoto/119/40916119_4.jpg)
The two ideals – fostering objectivity while still holding control of curriculum – create what seems to be an illogical dichotomy. While these groups clearly state their missions which involve wanting their children to learn how to think objectively (as illustrated in No Left Turn’s mission statement), they also want to control what their kids learn so that their family values are upheld in the public school classroom instead of what they are referring to as “progressive indoctrination.” Numerous national organizations such as Moms for Liberty and Parents Defending Education are also working to create a central movement aimed at removing any literature from classroom curriculum and school libraries that they feel is being used to spread “radical ideologies” (i.e., race and gender equality) to their children. In the words of No Left Turn’s mission statement, the site is trying, “To revive in American education the fundamental discipline of objective thinking by educating, empowering, and engaging students, parents, and community, emphasizing the role of the parent as the primary custodian and authority of their child.” And by doing so, they are working to create their vision which they defined as: “A future education where appreciation of American founding principles is fostered, family values are preserved, and every individual can pursue truth, virtue, beauty, and excellence.” No Left Turn is not alone in its mission. On No Left Turn’s “Indoctrination in Your State & District” tab, one can find nationwide reporting from those concerned with their local education. This anonymous complaint was posted on No Left Turn’s digital platform, where parents can report incidents in their public schools where they feel that their school’s curriculum is “ tainted with historical revisionism, political correctness, and the outright rejection of values which have long been at the core of the American experience,” as described by the website’s founder Elena Fishbein. The district calls it “DEI” (Diversity Equity and Inclusion), but it’s CRT covered in a nicely worded sheet,” read a post from an anonymous Ladue School District parent left on the website No Left Turn in Education. There has been an accelerated push toward CRT (Critical Race Theory) in my district in the past couple of years. “I am a teacher and concerned parent in the Ladue School District located near St.